By Venkatachari Jagannathan
Chennai, Oct 11 | Infusing fresh blood into the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) by offering voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) to older employees, appropriate staffing, and reviewing some of its guidelines or regulations are the need of the hour, said experts.
They also said unlike other industries where the cost of a product is known upfront, the cost in the case of an insurer will be known only at the end of two financial years.
Hence it is not possible to fix an overall limit expenses, instead of sub-limits, as demanded by some.
“The IRDAI is over two-decades old. The organisation lacks officials who are in tune with the changing industry trends while developing vested interests. It is time to introduce a VRS for the IRDAI staff and bring in fresh blood,” a retired Chairman-cum-Managing Director of a public sector general insurance company, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told IANS.
According to him, there is no accountability for officials in the IRDAI.
The expert also said that the IRDAI after failing in its primary job – efficient governance of the industry – ventured into the job of product designing and forcing the companies to sell the same.
IRDAI’s first Chairman, N. Rangachary told IANS that it is time for an organisational review since the body is more than two decades old.
Several senior industry officials have voiced their views to IANS.
“There should be a review committee to go into all regulatory aspects. It is time to see whether the original goal of forming the regulatory body has been fulfilled and if not, the action to be taken,” Rangachary suggested.
Echoing similar views was R. Ramakrishnan, Member of the Malhotra Committee on Insurance Reforms.
“It is high time the IRDAI is completely reviewed. This should have been done at the end of the first five years. Better late than never,” Ramakrishan told IANS.
As to what is to be reviewed, experts said the entire organisation, its structure, and regulations governing the sector.
“IRDAI is totally unprofessional and one cannot find such a regulator in any financial sector,” several industry officials have told IANS preferring anonymity.
So much so a former senior IRDAI official told IANS that “I am ashamed to say today that I was earlier with IRDAI.”
The retired CMD of the PSU insurer said the IRDAI has favoured the private non-life insurers and one of the example is its Motor Insurance Service Provider (MISP) guideline allowing payment of higher commissions of vehicle dealers.
“The expenses of an insurer are met out of the premium received. If nearly 40 per cent of the annual premium is paid to an intermediary, then there will not be anything left for payment of claims,” he added.
On the question of penalties levied by the IRDAI on the insurers, he said: “Monetary fines are not a deterrent. The regulator should bar an insurer from underwriting a particular line of business for a specified period.”
“Unlike the SEBI Act, there is no provision in the IRDA Act, to credit all sums received as penalties to the Consolidated Fund of India. Hence, the penalties imposed have to be just and reasonable, and not excessive, leading to unjust enrichment of the coffers of the Authority,” D. Varadarajan, a Supreme Court lawyer specialising in Insurance and Corporate Laws and a Member on KPN Committee on Insurance Laws Reforms told IANS.
Meanwhile, a former IRDAI member told IANS that the IRDAI “should develop its own inhouse talent rather than having officer on special duty (OSD)”.
A VRS can weed out vested interests which in turn would break the link with outside powers that decide on issue new player licensing.
Be that as it may, the industry is also wondering at to what is delaying the Central government from appointing a Chairman for IRDAI.
The post has been vacant for the past several months.
(Venkatachari Jagannathan can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org)