Evergrande financial crisis: An analysis


New Delhi, Sep 24 | Evergrande, a real estate juggernaut in China, is heading into its darkest days as the company is facing its worst-ever liquidity crunch with debts soaring over $305 billion.

Such a liquidity crisis may have far-reaching consequences as Mark Williams, Chief Asia Economist, Capital Economics, notes that this might be the biggest financial crisis China might witness post their world war economic expansion.

Evergrande was inaugurated as a bottled water company in 1996 by Hui Ka Yan in Guangzhou, China. Today, it is a pioneer in real estate with over 1,300 projects in around 280 cities. It has a diverse portfolio with branches extending into wealth management, FMCG, sports clubs and various sectors.

On September 14, the company vainly attempted to sell off some of its assets and to raise capital by equity. Today, the current liability of Evergrande stands tall at 1.97 trillion yuan, which is approximately 2 per cent of the GDP of China.

One of the prominent reasons for Evergrande’s prevailing sad state is the stagnant housing market in China. The housing market boom, which China witnessed for more than three decades, is gradually fading away with more Evergrande projects lining up but failing to sell the apartments.

That coupled with the economic slowdown due to Covid-19 became the recipe for gigabucks of debt. The company sold its apartments at a very low margin in order to raise capital, but to no avail. Subsequently, China’s new stringent lending policy on real estate industries brought Evergrande to its knees.

The liquidity crisis of Evergrande may have opened a Pandora’s Box of troubles for world economies. According to CNBC, the effect of the Evergrande crisis was witnessed across the stock markets of the World, including the US, the UK, Europe and Germany.

Hang Seng, the stock market index of Hong Kong, hit its 11-month low amid this financial crisis. Similarly, the stock index of the US and Japan also corrected around 2-3 per cent.

This crisis also reached the Indian shores with Indian metal industries such as Tata Steels, Jindal Steels, NALCO and Vedanta taking some serious hits with their stocks plummeting by 3-8 per cent.

According to Mint, Indian Iron industries may suffer due to this financial crisis as they ready themselves to be exported to China.

The Chinese government’s stance on the revival of Evergrande seems secondary as the prime focus is on evading the financial crisis imposed by Evergrande. This is evident from WeChat handle of the editor-in-chief of Global Times, a government-backed media house, who cautioned Evergrande to focus on saving themselves rather than looking for relief from the government.

This has worried the investors, the current investors alongside the probable investors, who had or are looking to invest in a plethora of projects in China.

There is a reasonable apprehension among the investors for imminent loss and lock-in of capital in China. Subsequently, the Chinese government, in order to woo foreign investors, has infused roughly 94 billion yuan into the economy through its banks and financial institutes.

Despite the perilous state of Evergrande, many investors such as BlackRock, UBS and HSBC have shown confidence in the company by buying into its debt.

According to Reuters, Evergrande has reached a settlement with its debtees on the interest payment by issuing domestic bonds. Such steps might soothe investors and debtees, who are breathing down on the company’s neck, for a while now.

The company and the Chinese government are desperately trying to evade the financial crisis at their respective levels to nip it in its bud and minimise, if not prevent, a likely knock-on effect on the domestic as well as the world economy.

According to analysts, it might take weeks to ascertain the impact of this financial crisis on the Chinese housing market and other markets incidental thereto.

However, it is unlikely that Evergrande’s cash crunch will spiral out as much as that of the Lehman Brothers crisis of 2008 as Brad McMillan commented: “Despite the worry, so far this looks like a corporate bankruptcy and not something worse… It’s a big one, to be sure, but one that can be handled within the system”.

Source: IANS

Next Story

Does MBA really help in getting a better job offer ?

Does MBA really help in getting a better job offer ?

Most students pursuing an MBA come with the sole objective of having a decent job offer or a promotion in the existing job soon after completion of the MBA. And most of them take loans to pursue this career dream. According to a recent survey by education portal Campusutra.com  74% MBA 2022-24 aspirants said they would opt for education loans.

There are exceptional cases like those seeking master’s degree or may have a family business to take care of or an entrepreneurial venture in mind. But the exception cases are barely 1%. For the rest 99%, a management degree is a ticket to a dream job through campus placements or leap towards career enhancements. Stakes are high as many of them quit their jobs which essentially means loss of 2 years of income, apprehension and uncertainty of the job market. On top of that, the pressure to pay back the education loans. Hence the returns have to be high. There is more than just the management degree. Colleges need to ensure that they offer quality management education which enables them to be prepared for not just the demands of recruiters and for a decent job but also to sustain and achieve, all along their career path.

  • So, what exactly are the B Schools doing to prepare their students for the job market and make them industry ready ?
  •  Are B schools ready to deliver and prepare the future business leaders to cope up with the disrupted market ?  

These are the two key questions every MBA aspirant needs to ask, check and validate before filling the MBA application forms of management institutes. And worth mentioning that these application forms do not come cheap. An MBA aspirant who may have shortlisted 5 B Schools to apply for, may end up spending Rs 10,000.00 to Rs 15,000.00 just buying MBA / PGDM application forms.

While internship and placements data of some management institutes clearly indicates that recruiters today have specific demands. The skill sets looked for are job centric and industry oriented. MBA schools which have adopted new models of delivery and technology, redesigned their courses, built an effective evaluation process and prepared the students to cope with the dynamic business scenario, have done great with campus placements despite the economic slow down.

However, the skill set being looked for by a consulting company like Deloitte or KPMG may be quite different from FMCG or a manufacturing sector. Institutes need to acknowledge this fact and act accordingly.

  • Management institutes should ensure that students are intellectually engaged, self motivated and adapt to changes fast. In one word ‘VUCA ready’.
  • B Schools should encourage students to participate in national and international competitive events, simulations of business scenarios.
  • Institutes should have the right mix of faculty members with industry exposure and pure academics.

The placement records of 2021 across top management institutes indicated the fact that recruitment is happening, skilled talent is in demand and certain management institutions continued to attract recruiters even in the middle of an ongoing crisis.

It is time, all management institutes rise to the occasion, understand market realities and identify areas of improvement at both ends – students and faculty.

After all, the stakes are high at both ends. B Schools taking corrective measures will stay while those which are lagging will end up shutting down.

Author Name : Nirmalya Pal


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here